RSS Feed

Tag Archives: Education Futures

Brief History of Online Platforms

Level2; Generating Ideas for online platforms

Imaginarium Day 1; We are spending 2 days imagining the future of education, with speakers providing 4 inputs, “news from the future” as stimulii. We are starting with Level1 stimulated by stories of children’s democracy at Summerhill school. This post deals with Level 2 The invention of the future (generating ideas for online platforms). My ideas for the future 2021 are here. Here are some other kids ideas.

A brief history of online platforms

1) Is browsing learning? Bernie Dodge; Yes! > WebQuests (the rubric) Start point; set by curriculum, end point by teacher, journey by learning

2) Brokering learning; education professionals must use their expertise of how the education system works to help students negotiate journeys thru learning, I call this “brokering learning

3) Building online learning platforms; key issues a) resource discovery b) learners as researchers need to evaluate c) a learning netiquette for collaboration d) discussion

4) Discussion Groups need moderating; moderation is the key skill in learning online; online learning needs a) resources b) discussion c) learningportfolio. This builds on Howard Rheingold’s concept of virtual communities

5) Virtual Learning Environment’s developed the online classroom concept, but based on Instructional Design invented by the Department of Defence (PLATO) to train military personal. Widespread use in UK Colleges as the more Moodle developed as a default.

6) Diana Laurillard in Rethinking University Education 1994 proposed a “conversational model” as the basis for Technology-Enhanced Learning Design

7 Learning Resources (catalogued in the National Grid for Learning & YAHOO) evolved into Learning Objects (early apps). Bite-Size learning with “formative assessment” emerged see

8 Learning Objects evolved into Learning Sequences (James Dalziel) or Learning Activity Management Systems. This allowed for co-creation of learning; teachers could sequence or learners could sequence.

9 O’Reilly announced the (resource-destination) Web had evolved into the (Read/Write) Web 2.0 a system in permanent beta allowing for architectures of participation to be developed by aggregating tools

10. The Read/Write Web allowed for the Read/Write collaborative tool of wiki’s to be developed; Wikipedia emerged as a collaborative resource destination

11. Hyper-fast search (google) meant search optimisation; resource evaluation more important but google skewed by advertising; reputation arrives

12 Some people developed social networks which was a platform (location) allowing a shift to learning being based online; Facebook dating agency for fun, NING for serious collaborative work (Classroom 2.0), ELGG for education-driven portfolio approaches

13 Social tagging arrives collaborative metadata for a collaborative web, delicious

14. Personal learning environments PLE’s, user-generated aggregation arrives; these are the resources that help my learning

15. Open Learning arrives; mostly as a content-push model, such as iTunes University, or MIT OCW lecture notes

16. Smart phones (“my post-modern University” Tony Hall) allowed for portable aggregation, permanent interaction

17. Personal learning networks stimulated by the arrival of Twitter; these are the people who help my social learning

18 Context-responsive learning arrives; open context modelling and augmented reality

19 Emergent Learning puts informal learning at the centre of the learning model

20 Ambient Learning puts cities at the centre of context-responsive learning

21 Aggregate then Curate emerges as a resource aggregation model.

22 Digital Scholar’s can now Co-create Open Scholarship


23 Mind Wide Open – This is your brain on learning…

Beyond the Classroom; “All learning a mixture of theorising and socialising”

Beyond the Web; what we have learnt from working with the participative affordances of the web and new technology is that instead of representational, hierarchical education we need creative, interactive, participative learning. Next we need to learn how to Put Context into Knowledge…

Links; Apologies! Links will be added during the day, this is a mob upload…

Imagining Education Futures

Issues in Imagining Futures

Background; These are notes which will shape my opening workshop at the Imaginarium. I will start by setting out a range of questions to answer to help shape a development framework with which we might be able to express what kind of future we want to build.

Dilemmas; There are a number of dilemmas that need to be resolved before we can start to envision futures. They represent some of the values that we will use to provide the framework with which we might design that future.

Education OR Learning; Are we designing an educational system or learning processes?

Subject-driven OR Interest-driven; Will we build around traditional subjects or learner interests?

International OR Local; Will we look for the “best” we can identify from global experiences or draw on local traditions, experiences, narratives and crafts?

Individual OR Collaborative; Will the focus of this future be individual achievement or collaborative endeavours?

Representative OR Participative; Will we be preparing learners to work within representative or participative contexts?

Hierarchical OR Networked;  Do we think the future will be about hierarchies or networks?

Issues; With these dilemmas in mind, and mindful of the values we wish to embody in our project we than have (at least) ten issues to address in developing our education future. They are;

1) Pedagogy; Will our chosen approach be subject-based based pedagogy, collaborative andragogy or creative heutagogy or perhaps one of the emerging ideas like Connectionism, or even a synthesis? Read the rest of this entry